Section 48 of Companies Act, 2013: Variation of Shareholders’ Rights Explained

byPaytm Editorial TeamSeptember 12, 2025
Section 154: Resolving Tax Incongruities
 This guide explains in simple English how companies in India can change the rights of certain shareholders under Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2013. It also covers how shareholder protection works, the legal steps required, and what happens if there is a dispute.

Introduction to Section 48

Companies sometimes need to change the rights attached to certain shares. Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2013 explains how this can be done legally and fairly. It sets rules for getting shareholder approval, protects minority investors, and ensures that companies follow a proper process when altering voting power, dividend rights, or other privileges linked to shares.

Purpose of Section 48 in corporate governance

Section 48 exists to make sure that when a company changes the rights of any group (class) of shareholders, it does so fairly and legally. It sets rules so that majority owners cannot easily harm the minority shareholders.

Importance of protecting shareholders’ rights

Shareholders invest money in a company with the promise of certain rights like voting, dividends, or special benefits. Section 48 helps protect these rights from being changed unfairly.

Applicability to different types of companies

Section 48 applies to all companies—public and private—that issue more than one class of shares. It does not matter if the company is big or small; if there are different share classes, these rules must be followed.

Understanding Shareholders’ Rights

Shareholders have certain legal rights such as:

  • The right to vote on important matters.
  • The right to receive dividends.
  • The right to inspect company records.
  • The right to share in profits or surplus assets if the company closes.

Common rights associated with different classes of shares

Different classes of shares (like equity or preference shares) may have different rights. For example, preference shareholders might get priority dividends but may not have voting rights, while equity shareholders usually vote on company matters.

Why variations in these rights may be required

Companies sometimes need to raise funds, restructure ownership, or meet investor requirements. In such cases, they might need to change (vary) rights like dividend percentage, voting power, or conversion rights.

Meaning of Variation of Shareholders’ Rights

Variation means altering, changing, or removing any special rights attached to a class of shares. It could mean giving more rights, reducing rights, or changing how they work.

Situations that may require variation of rights

  • Converting preference shares into equity shares.
  • Changing dividend rates.
  • Altering voting rights.
  • Introducing new types of shares that affect existing classes.

Examples of rights that can be altered

  • Dividend priority.
  • Right to vote on company matters.
  • Conversion options from one share type to another.
  • Rights during liquidation.

Procedure for Variation of Shareholders’ Rights under Section 48

A company must get written consent from at least 75% (three-fourths) of the shareholders of the class whose rights are being changed. Alternatively, it can hold a special meeting of that class and get a special resolution passed.

Role of special resolutions and voting thresholds

A special resolution means at least 75% of shareholders voting in favor. It ensures that a large majority agrees to the change, protecting minority shareholders.

Filing and compliance requirements with the Registrar of Companies

After approval, if at least 10% of the shareholders of that class disagree, they can approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) within 21 days. The change does not take effect until the Tribunal confirms it. Once confirmed, the company must file the Tribunal’s order with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days.

Safeguards for Minority Shareholders

If at least 10% of the shareholders of the affected class disagree, they can challenge the decision in NCLT. This protects smaller investors from unfair changes.

Recourse available when variations are unfair or oppressive

If the Tribunal finds the variation unfair or oppressive, it can cancel the resolution. This ensures companies act in good faith.

Tribunal intervention and remedies

The NCLT can stop the variation, suggest modifications, or uphold it if fair. This acts as a final safety net.

Role of the Articles of Association (AoA)

The Articles of Association (AoA) is like a rulebook for a company. It often contains specific steps for changing shareholders’ rights. The company must follow both AoA and Section 48 rules.

Interaction between AoA and shareholders’ agreements

Sometimes shareholders also have private agreements. The company must respect both the legal (statutory) requirements and contractual promises made to investors.

Ensuring compliance with both statutory and contractual terms

A careful review of both AoA and agreements helps prevent legal challenges later.

Practical Examples of Variation of Rights

Conversion of preference shares to equity shares

Sometimes companies convert preference shares into equity shares. This changes dividend and voting rights.

Alteration of dividend or voting rights

Companies may increase or decrease dividend rates or give voting rights to previously non-voting shares.

Case-based scenarios from Indian corporate practice

For example, a startup might issue special shares to an investor with veto power. Later, it might need to remove or modify those powers to raise new funds. Section 48 provides a legal way to do this fairly.

Landmark judgments interpreting Section 48

Indian courts have clarified that:

  • Any change affecting another class indirectly may also require that class’s consent.
  • The process must be genuine, not oppressive or fraudulent.

Principles derived from judicial rulings

  • Fairness and good faith are key.
  • Rights cannot be altered to benefit a majority at the cost of a minority.

Impact of these cases on future corporate decisions

Companies now proceed with caution, ensuring broad consent and proper filings to avoid Tribunal challenges.

Comparison with Global Practices

How other jurisdictions handle variation of rights

Many countries, like the UK, Singapore, and the US, also require high shareholder approval and protect minority rights similarly.

Global investors expect strong minority protection. Indian law aligns well with these global norms.

Relevance for Indian companies with global investors

Compliance builds investor trust and makes it easier to attract foreign investment.

Key Challenges and Compliance Risks

Common mistakes companies make during variation

  • Not checking AoA for required procedures.
  • Missing the 21-day window for Tribunal challenges.
  • Not filing with the Registrar within time.

Penalties for non-compliance under the Companies Act

Fines can range from ₹25,000 to ₹5 lakh, and officers may face imprisonment up to six months.

Preventive steps and best practices for smooth execution

  • Seek legal advice before making changes.
  • Communicate clearly with shareholders.
  • Keep proper records of meetings, resolutions, and filings.

Conclusion : Section 48 balances a company’s flexibility to alter shareholder rights with the need to protect minority investors. By following proper legal procedures, companies can ensure fairness, build trust, prevent disputes, and support growth while treating all investors equitably.

FAQs

What is Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2013?

It is the law that explains how companies can change the rights attached to a certain class of shares while protecting minority shareholders.

Who can challenge a variation of shareholder rights?

If at least 10% of the shareholders of the affected class disagree, they can apply to the Tribunal within 21 days.

Is approval needed from all shareholders to change rights?

No, approval from 75% of the affected class is enough.

Does Section 48 apply to private companies?

Yes, if they have more than one class of shares.

Why would a company want to change shareholder rights?

To raise funds, restructure, or adjust to new investor needs.

Can rights be improved, not just reduced?

Yes, variations can add benefits as well, such as better dividends or new voting rights.

What happens if the company skips proper procedure?

The variation can be declared invalid, and the company or officers may face penalties.

You May Also Like