- GSTAT launched by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in New Delhi on 24 September 2025.
- Tribunal aims for simple, digital, and time-bound tax dispute resolution.
- GSTAT e-Courts Portal launched for e-filing, tracking, and virtual hearings.
- Principal Bench in Delhi, with 31 State Benches across 45 locations.
- Appeals can be filed in staggered phases till 30 June 2026 for smooth transition.
- Tribunal composition ensures judicial + technical expertise with Centre and State representation.
- Leaders stress GSTAT as a step toward ease of doing business, taxpayer trust, and fair justice.
Source: PIB
Union Finance and Corporate Affairs Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman officially launched the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) in New Delhi, marking a major step in strengthening India’s indirect tax dispute resolution system.
Calling GSTAT not just an institutional reform but a symbol of India’s evolving tax system, the Finance Minister said it reflects the government’s determination to “continue improving, reforming, and adapting for the future.” In line with the principle of ‘Nagarik Devo Bhava,’ Smt. Sitharaman highlighted that GSTAT’s focus must be clear: it should deliver jargon-free decisions in plain language, adopt simplified formats and checklists, enable digital-by-default filings and virtual hearings, and maintain time standards for listing, hearing, and pronouncements.
Sitharaman highlighted that the ultimate outcome of GSTAT must be straightforward — reducing legal frictions, speeding up cash flows, enabling MSMEs and exporters to invest with confidence, and ensuring that citizens experience the benefits of the GST system.
About GSTAT
The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) is a statutory appellate body under GST law, designed to hear appeals against orders of GST Appellate Authorities. It provides taxpayers with an independent, nationwide forum for dispute resolution.
- Principal Bench: New Delhi
- State Benches: 31 benches across 45 locations in India
- Composition: Judicial and technical members representing both Centre and States
- Digital Infrastructure: e-Courts Portal for online filing, tracking, and virtual hearings
This Tribunal is expected to bring consistency in interpretation, predictability in outcomes, and credibility in the appellate process, strengthening India’s tax governance.
Key Highlights from the Launch
Aspect | Details |
---|---|
Event | Launch of Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) |
Date & Place | 24 September 2025, New Delhi |
Launched by | Union Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman |
Other Dignitaries Present | Union MoS Finance Shri Pankaj Chaudhary, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra (President GSTAT), Shri Rao Narbir Singh (Minister, Haryana), senior Revenue Department officials, GST officers, legal fraternity, trade & industry representatives |
Core Vision | Jargon-free, simplified, digital, and time-bound dispute resolution |
Key Outcomes Expected | Faster dispute resolution, reduced litigation delays, improved cash flow, stronger investor confidence, enhanced taxpayer trust |
Technological Backbone | GSTAT e-Courts Portal (developed by GSTN & NIC) for e-filing, case tracking, and virtual hearings |
Operational Structure | Principal Bench in New Delhi, 31 State Benches across 45 locations |
Bench Composition | Two Judicial Members + One Technical Member (Centre) + One Technical Member (State) |
Special Provision | Staggered filing of appeals allowed up to 30 June 2026 for smooth transition |
Leaders’ Statements
Union Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman:
“GSTAT is result of our determination to continue improving, reforming, and adapting for the future.”
MoS Finance Shri Pankaj Chaudhary:
“Strong appellate mechanism instils this trust that justice will be swift and fair.”
Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra (President, GSTAT):
“Cooperation of Central and State Governments has been instrumental in enabling timely establishment of the GST Appellate Tribunal.”
Revenue Secretary Shri Arvind Shrivastava:
“GSTAT to provide a specialised, nationwide forum for consistency in interpretation, predictability in outcomes, and credibility to the appellate process.”